... respectfully, I doubt that build should be failing due to me changing something in Magiclysm.

yeah, seems like overmap error on Lua side.

So regarding changes to the spells being technomancer, luckily it's not too much to fix:

1. Bless isn't confined to any techomancer-specific spells, instead it's found in a generic holy magic spellbook and a spell scroll. In both cases, nothing player-facing says they're technomancer-specific, just JSON comments: https://github.com/cataclysmbnteam/Cataclysm-BN/blob/upload/data/mods/Magiclysm/items/spell_scrolls.json#L611 and https://github.com/cataclysmbnteam/Cataclysm-BN/blob/upload/data/mods/Magiclysm/items/spellbooks.json#L91
2. Holy Blade's in the same boat, only referred to as such via JSON comments in its spell scroll and a paladin-themed book: https://github.com/cataclysmbnteam/Cataclysm-BN/blob/upload/data/mods/Magiclysm/items/spell_scrolls.json#L620 and https://github.com/cataclysmbnteam/Cataclysm-BN/blob/upload/data/mods/Magiclysm/items/spellbooks.json#L108 (the latter also covers Spiritual Armor, as it's learned from the paladin book).
3. As mentioned, the paladin book's JSON comment covers Spiritual Armor, the comment saying its spell scroll is for technomancers is here: https://github.com/cataclysmbnteam/Cataclysm-BN/blob/upload/data/mods/Magiclysm/items/spell_scrolls.json#L629

Oddly, no professions start with those spells and no references to technomancers I could find (like documentation or the trait description) give any mention of a holy theme,. This is probably just Korg haphazardly lumping all item-spawning spells in with technomancy, since several other spells it gets are more thematically appropriate and revolve around conjuring stuff.

So regarding changes to the spells being technomancer, luckily it's not too much to fix:

1. Bless isn't confined to any techomancer-specific spells, instead it's found in a generic holy magic spellbook and a spell scroll. In both cases, nothing player-facing says they're technomancer-specific, just JSON comments: https://github.com/cataclysmbnteam/Cataclysm-BN/blob/upload/data/mods/Magiclysm/items/spell_scrolls.json#L611 and https://github.com/cataclysmbnteam/Cataclysm-BN/blob/upload/data/mods/Magiclysm/items/spellbooks.json#L91
2. Holy Blade's in the same boat, only referred to as such via JSON comments in its spell scroll and a paladin-themed book: https://github.com/cataclysmbnteam/Cataclysm-BN/blob/upload/data/mods/Magiclysm/items/spell_scrolls.json#L620 and https://github.com/cataclysmbnteam/Cataclysm-BN/blob/upload/data/mods/Magiclysm/items/spellbooks.json#L108 (the latter also covers Spiritual Armor, as it's learned from the paladin book).
3. As mentioned, the paladin book's JSON comment covers Spiritual Armor, the comment saying its spell scroll is for technomancers is here: https://github.com/cataclysmbnteam/Cataclysm-BN/blob/upload/data/mods/Magiclysm/items/spell_scrolls.json#L629

Oddly, no professions start with those spells and no references to technomancers I could find (like documentation or the trait description) give any mention of a holy theme,. This is probably just Korg haphazardly lumping all item-spawning spells in with technomancy, since several other spells it gets are more thematically appropriate and revolve around conjuring stuff.

Good, I would have been surprised if it was actually in anything technomancer anyway

And yeah, looks like it gets a few spells that really ought to be either Magus or classless. Technomancer really is a mess, ngl

Yep, looks like this is good to go, tweaking JSON comments can always be done whenever. Maybe at some point we'll either think up ideas or see what DDA's added that can be ported without too much screaming at C++...

Yep, looks like this is good to go, tweaking JSON comments can always be done whenever. Maybe at some point we'll either think up ideas or see what DDA's added that can be ported without too much screaming at C++...

Yup, JSON comments are no big deal. And I can definitely take a more comprehensive look at spells and where they are later when I get around to mucking through spell balancing. I only fixed these because I felt them particularly egregious when I realized my Paladin Spellbook had two "Technomancer" spells in them. Not to mention eventually seeing about adding some new spells.

Aren't demon spider queens supposed to be effectively unkillable using standard weapons though? You had to use anti-tank weapons or magic

Aren't demon spider queens supposed to be effectively unkillable using standard weapons though? You had to use anti-tank weapons or magic

Given its huge health pool, I doubt even those would have scratched it. Especially the magic. Also, if that was truly the intent, then I fundamentally disagree with the idea. It should take a lot to bring down, sure, but not anti TANK munitions

It's a demon spider queen, so it has an excuse to be magically super tough. My usual approach against them has been to hit them with anti-tank weapons: TOW missiles, Carl Gustav rounds, and 30mm autocannon and 120mm tank rounds from Tankmod. You can even take them out with a .50 cal. That just takes a lot of ammo and attracts a ton of attention, which offers a tactical challenge to the player.

I've also taken them out with specialized ramming vehicles equipped with powerful engines, heavy frames, and road rollers.

I've also taken them out with magic missile through the wall of the nest, with the help of a mask of insight to see through the wall, which works because magic missile does true damage, piercing all armor.

I've also lured the demon spiders (including the queen) out into towns and used them to clear the town of zombies.

There are lots of ways to handle and even leverage creatures that cannot be killed through obvious means, but it makes the player think outside the box, you know?

Aren't demon spider queens supposed to be effectively unkillable using standard weapons though? You had to use anti-tank weapons or magic

IIRC the fact that they had that much HP was a typo, and no one corrected it; because of lazyness or giggles i dont know. that and the fact that the lairs arent that good loot wise

It's a demon spider queen, so it has an excuse to be magically super tough. My usual approach against them has been to hit them with anti-tank weapons: TOW missiles, Carl Gustav rounds, and 30mm autocannon and 120mm tank rounds from Tankmod. You can even take them out with a .50 cal. That just takes a lot of ammo and attracts a ton of attention, which offers a tactical challenge to the player.

I've also taken them out with specialized ramming vehicles equipped with powerful engines, heavy frames, and road rollers.

I've also taken them out with magic missile through the wall of the nest, with the help of a mask of insight to see through the wall, which works because magic missile does true damage, piercing all armor.

I've also lured the demon spiders (including the queen) out into towns and used them to clear the town of zombies.

There are lots of ways to handle and even leverage creatures that cannot be killed through obvious means, but it makes the player think outside the box, you know?

I mean, it's not like it's easy to kill it now. 7 dynamites, 14 shots of .50, or 14 max-level ice spikes are not exactly cheap. Pretty sure its health is still the largest out of anything, especially shipping in-repo. Tis still a challenge, but at least now you can reasonably try and take it down without needing obscene anti-tank weaponry (or a tank itself)

Aren't demon spider queens supposed to be effectively unkillable using standard weapons though? You had to use anti-tank weapons or magic

IIRC the fact that they had that much HP was a typo, and no one corrected it; because of lazyness or giggles i dont know. that and the fact that the lairs arent that good loot wise

Given all the other laziness / unbalance in Magiclysm, wouldn't surprise me too much if it was somehow a typo that just never got fixed.

If I recall, I'm fairly certain the original typo was giving it 56000 HP, with 5600 being actually intended (albeit wacky, that's still 600 more than Cata++'s Bio-Weapon Apophis has when he's actually MEANT to be tough as fuck and a major storyline boss, with both having similar armor levels, only really lacking Apophis' long-since-nerfed regen).

If I recall, I'm fairly certain the original typo was giving it 56000 HP, with 5600 being actually intended (albeit wacky, that's still 600 more than Cata++'s Bio-Weapon Apophis has when he's actually MEANT to be tough as fuck and a major storyline boss, with both having similar armor levels, only really lacking Apophis' long-since-nerfed regen).

Oh gods, 56000 HP would be absolutely horrible.

The demon spider queen having 56000 HP isn't an accident and isn't that hard to deal with.

Korg says he deliberately "put this monster in partly as a stretch goal for the kind of power level I would like the player to be able to deal with at the end game. And given the other comments in this thread, I have at least partly succeeded." (https://old.reddit.com/r/cataclysmdda/comments/oy87gi/demon_spiders_are_absolutely_busted_beyond_reason/h7xrxrq/)

What else are the copious amounts of anti-tank weapons you inevitably find actually useful for?

What else actually presents a challenge for lategame character damage output capabilities?

It sounds to me like you just didn't think outside the box about how to deal with them.

could we continue this in github discussions? closed pull requests are usually not great for prolonged discussions.

It sounds to me like you just didn't think outside the box about how to deal with them.

also, it'd be really great if we could tone down our words a little bit.

Korg says he deliberately "put this monster in partly as a stretch goal for the kind of power level I would like the player to be able to deal with at the end game. And given the other comments in this thread, I have at least partly succeeded."

Considering that @foulman had to repeatedly remind him that his spells generally start off at "if you're lucky it will top double-digit damage" and eventually max out at "now it's still less useful than a gun", a lesson he repeatedly failed to heed, I'd say he only succeeded in adding the challenge that warrants said firepower but failed at delivering on the other end of it.